During the last year their has been a lot of wake up calls for this country since we have elected and installed our new president. We, as Americans have a lot to think about this Christmas season. How long will we remain free and how much longer will we have the freedoms that our forefathers had and enjoyed. This past year should be a wake up call for all Americans who love freedom. The take over of the banks, financial institutions, auto makers and many other businesses, including trying to impose a heath care system on this country that would set the medical field back 100 years. This has all happen in less than one year. The tripling of the nations deficit that keeps getting bigger. Everyone of these is, or should be, a serious wake up call for all Americans. We have a president that wants to make a security force that is bigger than the army and answerable only to him. Why? What is wrong with the Secret Service, FBI, CIA, ATF, and many state and local police departments?

But here is truly, a most important wake up call that most American people have just passed over and over looked. During the last two hundred years the United States has gone around the world to spread and promote democracy to other countries. Too bad Obama don't practice what this country has preached and believes in a little closer to home. All we have to do is to look at Honduras and see that this country present administration is not practicing what The United States has spread around the world in the past. That is all people are free and have the right to make a choice.

It is unthinkable that a president of freedom-loving Americans will stood toe to toe with and along side of Venezuela's Hugo Chavez and Cuba's Castro in their effort to sabotage and under mind the country of Honduras as they fought to keep their country free of communism and socialist values. It is beyond belief that The Obama Administration demanded that the poor country, of Honduras restore Manuel Zelaya, who was forcibly removed from power on June 29, after he attempted to subvert and destroy the constitution of that country and hold a referendum to make himself president for life. In other words he was trying to set himself up to be a dictator. There would have been no more freedoms for that little country. Here a little and there a little Zelaya was setting himself up as a dictator. He stood for the Liberal Party in the November 2005 presidential election and won by a narrow margin. But since then he has gone way to the left.

Despite his middle of the road credentials, Zelaya moved Honduras away from its traditional ally the United States, winning the support of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez and other leftist (communist) leaders. Publicly backed by such leftists (communist) leaders such as Mr Chavez, Bolivian President Evo Morales and former Cuban leader Fidel Castro, Mr Zelaya began to lose the support of his own party. In May 2007, Mr Zelaya ordered all of the country's TV and radio stations to carry government propaganda for two hours a day, accusing them of giving his government unfair coverage. In August 2008, he took Honduras into the Bolivian Alternative for the Americas (Alba), an organization set up by Venezuela as an alternative to the stalled US plan for a Free Trade Area of the Americas. Mr Zelaya's removal came as he pressed on with plans to hold a public conference to ask people whether they supported moves to change the constitution. This would have meant adding a question to the ballot for November's presidential election on setting up a body charged with redrawing and making a new constitution.

What happened in Honduras on June 28 was legal, although not perfect, but we are not living in a perfect world. The attorney general of Honduras charged Zelaya with violating a number of clauses of the Honduran Constitution. The Supreme Court backed him up, and when Zelaya refused to comply with the court order, a warrant was issued for his arrest. Yes, the army removed Zelaya from the country, but only because it feared violence by his communist supporters, who were already gaining a foot hold in that country, and the leaders of that country also wanted to uphold the constitution of the country. Roberto Micheletti, the former head of Congress, was the next in line for the presidency, and he was ratified for this office by an overwhelming vote, including the majority of Zelaya's own party. All of Honduras' democratic institutions were fully functioning and intact. Honduras held its scheduled presidential election Nov. 29 – the one Zelaya was seeking to undermine – and has invited in independent observers from around the globe.

This was not good enough for Obama. The Obama administration demanded that Honduras reinstate Zelaya as president even though he is not legally eligible to run again, even though he was trying to subvert and destroy the constitution of his country and its freedoms. To further strong arm Honduras into taking Zelaya back, the Obama administration cut $30 million in aid {that is a lot for a small country}, had visas suspended and stood by as the country of Honduras was dumped from the U.N. Human Rights Council by the likes of Nicaragua and Cuba, both of which are communist countries. This is no way for a freedom living government to treat or help a poor neighboring country trying to sustain and uphold a democratic government and give its citizens a better quality of life. We should have done the same to Honduras as we have done to other countries that want freedom. Help Them!

As I was researching materials on terrorism for my blog on the web I read a startling and upsetting article that Obama wrote about the 9/11 jihadists (terrorist) eight days after the attack on the Twin Towers, the Pentagon, and the plane that crashed in Pennsylvania that left 3,000 innocent men, women, and children dead on American soil. That article really disturbed me for a man that is now our president to say what he did in that article. It was his recommendations and advice on how to stop the jihad terrorist, in a local Chicago newspaper, he had published eight days after the September 11 terrorist attacks. What he said was so unbelievable! This is in part of what he said: “We must also engage, however, in the more difficult task of understanding the sources of such madness. The essence of this tragedy, it seems to me, derives from a fundamental absence of empathy {understanding, sympathy, compassion} on the part of the attackers: an inability to imagine, or connect with, the humanity and suffering of others. Such a failure of empathy, such numbness to the pain of a child or the desperation of a parent, is not innate; nor, history tells us, is it unique to a particular culture, religion, or ethnicity. It may find expression in a particular brand of violence, and may be channeled by particular demagogues or fanatics. Most often, though, it grows out of a climate of poverty and ignorance, helplessness and despair.” Is this man (Obama) for real? Osama bin Laden’s murderous legions are plenty able to “imagine” the “suffering of others.” Go watch an al Qaeda beheading video on Google or surf You-Tube While you watch it please tell me if these terrorist were trained in the suffering of infidels and please tell me if it is covered in Their Basic Jihadist Training. I’ll repeat again what Obama said in the week after the 9/11 attack was to identify and make it out as a “tragedy” stemming from lack of “empathy” and “understanding”–instead of yet another deliberate, carefully planned evil act of the long-waged Islamic war on the West that it was. What was there to understand about the killing of three thousand people. What is there to understand about the attack on the USS Cole and the marine barrack in Lebanon? What about the soldiers and the pregnant women and all the people that were wounded and killed at Fort hood, Texas? As for Obama’s continued delusion about the “climate of poverty and ignorance” that supposedly breeds Muslim terrorists, can our great politicians ever rid their selves of this unreality-based crap? That is exactly what it is “Crap” This belief is part of the same absurdity and stupid silliness that lead the State Department to embrace and cuddle the Muslim world and the same reason President Bush opened up our aviation schools to more Saudi students to “improve understanding.” John McCain also said education was the cure for Islamic terrorism when he was at the L.A. World Affairs Council in March, when he declared that “In this struggle, scholarships will be far more important than smart bombs.” (really) Just what we need: more student visas for that jihadist-infested nation that sent us most of the 9/11 hijackers. This kind of thinking will only bring us more of the same results in the very near future. When is our government going to wake up to the fact that these people want to kill us. When are they going to wake up to the fact these people do not want for us to befriend them or to be their buddies. They want to kill us. They despise everything that this country stands for. Wake up Mr. Obama and the rest of you liberals in congress. Smell the coffee! These Muslim terrorist have only one thing on their mind. That is to kill the infidel. This has been the same way for thousands of years and it will only get worse until we take a more firm stand against it. There’s plenty of genuine documented evidence out there (you only have to look) that would debunk Obama’s way of thinking. If you will look and read you will find that the most ruthless ‘extremists are those fanatics, better known as terrorist, who have lived in the United States and England, have been most exposed to the west and western education: from Osama bin Laden (summer school at Oxford and Mohammed Atta Hamburg University urban planning student) to the London School of Economics graduate responsible for the beheading of Daniel Pearl. The idea that handing out college scholarships to young Saudi males and getting them hooked on Starbucks and car-chase movies will make this stuff go away is ridiculous and unworthy of a president or a senator of this country. Politics will never solve this problem. This was proved in Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, and now Afghanistan. We must un tie the hands of our military and let them do the job they were trained to do. Let them win! It is sad when a country will send a young soldier to be shot at and maybe killed, but tie their hands so they cannot fight back properly. A government has two choices. They can refrain from sending any soldiers at all or they can send soldiers to do a job and when they do: do not put no handcuffs on them. Turn them loose and give them what they need to win! Ayman al-Zawahiri did not need any more education or wealth to guide him away from Islamic imperialism. He has a medical degree. So does the former Hamas terrorist Abdel Rantissi. Seven upper-middle-class jihadist doctors were mixed up in the 2007 London/Glasgow bombings. Suspected al Qaeda scientist Affia Siddiqui, still wanted by the FBI for questioning, is a Pakistani who studied microbiology at MIT and did graduate work in neurology at Brandeis. And as I’ve said several times before and I will say again to the hard of hearing, politicians, in Washington, reducing the academic standards of our colleges helped the al Qaeda mastermind Khalid Shaikh Mohammed further the jihadist cause. In the early 1980s, he enrolled at the small Chowan College in Murfreesboro, N.C., which had dropped its English requirements to attract wealthy Middle Easterners. (big mistake)At Chowan, Mohammed bonded and had ties with other Muslim foreign students known as “The Mullahs” because of their religious zeal. Mohammed then transferred to North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, where he earned his degree in mechanical engineering along with 30 other Muslims. Mohammed applied his Western learning to oversee the 1993 World Trade Center bombing plot (six Americans dead), the U.S.S. Cole attack (17 American soldiers dead), and the September 11 attacks (3,000 dead). He has also been linked to the 1998 African-embassy bombings (212 dead, including 12 Americans), the plot to kill the pope, the murder of American journalist Daniel Pearl, and the Bali nightclub bomb blast that killed nearly 200 tourists, including two more Americans. Perhaps the bleeding-heart Obama thinks a master’s degree in social work would have convinced poverty-stricken, helpless, ignorant, despairing Mohammed to change his mind? Maybe if these terrorist could have got just a little bit more education that they would have had more understanding and would not have killed those three thousand people. What we have here (according to Obama) is a failure to communicate? What do you think? I think that the best way to communicate with these people (the terrorist) is to wipe them off the face of the earth before they do the same thing to us. Let them know that we will fight them on our streets, we will fight them in our churches, we will fight them in our government, we will fight them from shore to shore, and we will take the fight to them until there is not a threat anymore. The day of giving them ice cream and loli pops is over. No Mr. Obama it is not a failure of empathy as you say, but it is a failure of your government and some past governments to realize what these jihadist are all about. The destruction of the free world as we know it. If we had that mind set in world war two, as Obama has now, we would be speaking Japanese and German. We would be bowing before the emperor and walking the German goose step as we haled Hitler. We need leaders who will realize these people want to destroy us and there is no amount of empathy that will stop that.

Imagine how our Founding Fathers would react if they saw what has become of this once great Nation. Actually, perhaps most Americans already suspect what that reaction would be from those brave, conservative, God-fearing Founding Fathers. Little doubt, it would be the same as it was when they decided to take a stand for independence the first time around. Obama is destroying our country by removing essential parts of it that has made this country great. America has elected and is consequently stuck with a President that has never accomplished anything of significance that would merit the highest office in her great land. In Addition, this person America now calls their President stands 180 degrees in opposition with every other US President holding office prior to his inauguration (regardless of party affiliation). America has experienced the greatest economic collapse since the Great Depression and President Obama's answer is to give a speech to manipulate Americans into believing bigger government is the answer to everyone's problems. Regardless of political affiliation, Americans of all races, ages and sexes are starting to wake up and see that Obama and his administration has and continues do away with our Lady Liberty. In a recent speech to the American people (or for those disconnected few still listening to this president's drivel), Obama sounded more like a starving baby in search of a bottle, or one needing it's diaper changed, than a man supposedly having the most powerful position on earth. People are finally waking up to his fake transparency and are standing up for their rights and for this they are called many things and none of them good. However I must remind the reader that he kept his promise to change America. We are fast going away from the America that we once knew and grew up in. Some of the things that he has done already are mind boggling and beyond all comprehension. If there was ever a time when the sense of smell oozed from the television and filled the living rooms and homes across this nation, it was during Obama's infamous "It's Not About Me" speech. The problem with him is it is all about him. A little over six months ago America's economy was not good; however, as bad as it was then, it was nothing compared to how bad the US economy is presently. And for that matter, if Obama continues to get his way, America has yet to see just how bad her country's economy will suffer, but not only the economy but our freedoms also. It goes beyond all belief that a paid government official, (a bureaucrat) who was not even confirmed by the Senate but just one of the many "czars" selected and put into place by Obama, could at a whim just cut the pay of executives in private businesses by 50 percent or 90 percent? No up or down vote by congress, it was just done. Who would ever believe that this would happen in America. Did you know that a Obama appointed czar wants to restrict and limit talk radio? They want to do this to keep the talk within their fixed limitations. Obama and his czars also have plans to subsidize and fund newspapers. This means that Obama and his czars want to make a situation where the newspapers' existence would depend on the government saying it is okay what they write? Did you ever think that anyone would even be talking about having a group who would make a decision who could and could not get life-saving medical treatments? Chilling as that is from a medical standpoint, it is also chilling from the standpoint of our freedom. If you have a parent who needs a major operation or a child with some grim medical condition, how free would you feel to speak out against an administration that has the authority to make life and death decisions about your loved ones? Does any of this sound like America that you grew up in? How about a government organization giving your children and other children information to enroll them on the side of the president? Merely being assigned to sing his praises in class is clearly not enough. Are we headed for trouble? This not the country that we grow up in and our soldiers bleed and died for. At the rate we are going Americans can kiss their freedoms good bye. How much of our freedom will be left if Obama is allowed to continue on this path? There will be none! Our lack of liberty and choice will be gone. Obama already wants a national police force. Why would he want this? We already have local police forces in most towns and cities. We have military forces for the defense of our country. We also have the FBI for federal crimes and the National Guard is located in every state of this union for local emergencies. What would be the role of a national police force created by Barack Obama, with all its leaders appointed by him and answerable only to him? It seems more like the brown shirts and the Gestapo in world war two Germany than like anything we have in this country. What would be the reason for this? How far Obama will go depends on how much resistance and opposition he encounter as he tries to do these things. But the direction in which he is trying to go tells us more than all his rhetoric or speech-making. Barack Obama has not only said that he is out to "change the United States of America," the people he has been associated with and next to for years have expressed in words and deeds their opposition to the values, the principles and the main beliefs of this country. Jeremiah Wright said it, over national TV with these words: "God damn America!" Bill Ayers said it with bombs that he put in government buildings and just recently said he did not do enough. This is Obama's friend. Obama's Community activist buddies have said it with their contempt and dislike for the constitutional rights of other people, for example the 2nd amendment. Among the people appointed as czars by President Obama have been people who have praised enemy dictators like Mao and Castro. Some have accused Bush of being behind the tragedy of Twin towers on 911. For those of you who say that the Obama should have looked into those people's back ground more carefully and in more detail before he appointed them are not seeing who Obama really is and are totally missing the point. Why should anybody think that Obama didn't know what these people were like, when he has been associating with these kinds of people for ten or twenty years before he moved into the White House? Nothing is more like a roadmap than Obama's consistent lifetime patterns than putting such people in government, people who reject and hate American values, resent Americans in general and Americans who are successful in particular, as well as resenting America's influence and power in the world. Any blunder or boo-boo about this on his part would be in not thinking that others would discover what these cunning appointees were like. Had it not been for the Fox News Channel and people like Glen Beck, Bill O'Reily, and Sean Hannity these cunning appointees might have never been known for what they are until it was too late. This is one of the reasons Fox News is now high on the administration's enemies list. The cat is out of the bag. Nothing so exemplifies Obama's own contempt and disrespect for American values and traditions than apologizing to other nations for the United States. Most folks, in this country are starting to wake up to ask: "Where is the transparency he promised. They are beginning to see that he is taking away everyone of our freedoms, one by one. We have let the Trojan horse in. Whether enough people will wake up in time to keep America from being dismantled and taken apart, disassembled piece by piece, and given to the Muslim terrorist is another question, and it is, by far, the biggest question for this generation of Americans. For what they are, if Obama's skills and experience as President could be transferred to that of a surgeon, how many of his followers, if they needed surgery, would willing go under his knife? Will there be a America left after his four years?

Since President Obama was elected, he has appointed at least 34 supposed "czars" to supervise and take charge of a lot of governmental responsibilities. These czars have been described as "super aides" (really super aids) that work across agency lines to move forward and set in motion the President's agendas and programs for different things that he wants. I thought that was what people were elected to congress for. CBS News (not one of my favorite places to get fair and balance news) says that these czars "report directly to Mr. Obama and have the power to shape national policy on their subject area." This means they bypass the congress and the American people. The very future of this country is being shaped by people who were not elected or confirmed by congress. This should be scary to the reader! What about congress and the American people? Where do they come in during the Obama years?The lines defining the limitations of the czars' power are unclear, even to many in Congress. Let me give you one example that I found, Republican Senator Susan Collins of Maine said:"Who's in charge of health care? Is it the Secretary of Health and Human Services?(a person who was confirmed by congress) Or is the White House czar ( a person who was appointed by Obama and is answerable only to him)? Who is in charge of environmental and energy issues?" that is a good question and it needs an answer. Who is really in charge of this country? Is it the elected officials or is it Obama and his czars? Czars do not need or require Congressional approval. {amazing} With most of this so called czars there are no confirmation hearings, no up or down votes, for this reason the czars are insulated and protected from accountability and for anything they do, from Congress and the American People. Did our fore fathers want this when they framed the constitution. Most Americans are very critical of these czars and have the view that such an arrangement (I would rather call it a pack) threatens to increase the power of the President (who by the way appoints these czars) beyond what is Constitutionally mandated. Read what Democrat Senator Robert Byrd, and he is just one of many, has said about the Obama Czar system: "It can threaten the Constitutional system of checks and balances … As presidential assistants and advisers, these White House staffers are not accountable for their actions to the Congress, to cabinet officials, or to virtually anyone but the president. They rarely testify before congressional committees, and often shield the information and decision-making process behind the assertion of executive privilege." A question that I would like to ask is this: "Where are the checks and balances with these czars". Obama promised "change" and we are sure getting that! What did Obama say, just before the elections, about being 5 days away from "fundamentally transforming America"..... I guess he was right, because he sure is doing that. Why are there so many communists and Marxists in the Obama Administration? Who are these people? Whose paying them? Why are there so many empty posts in the Administration, that was put into place by congress, and why do we have all these un-vetted people advising our President? Why does the Administration not want the FBI to check and investigate people anymore? These are questions that have to be answered. Some who read this will say that I'm a whack job, a racist, a wing nut, but when you stop and think about it, am I? Just investigate the background of some of these czars yourself using reliable web sites and you will see the same shocking things as I did. Just read these few things that I found and then search for yourself. Some of these czars believe or have openly stated that: {1} The United States was responsible for the twin towers attack on 911, {2} Illegal's have just as much right in this country as citizens, {3} Most of them have Marxist views or socialist views, {4} some believe that the constitution should be updated, and {4} there is a lot more that you can read from reliable sources. This is the change we got when Obama and his socialist views and crowd was elected to the highest office in our land. We have not only the right to ask who these people are, but, since it is our government and our country, We have the responsibility to know who they are and what they are doing. Not only do we have these czars, that are accountable only to Obama, we also have no checks and balances in our government and to me that is very scary. We now have the most liberal President, liberal congress, and liberal Supreme Court ever. In other words there is really no way to stop their liberal agenda and one again that is scary! Make no mistake, Obama knows exactly what he is doing. This is a first-rate power grab by a power-hungry President. (don't take that lightly). You see the great thing about czars, as I have already said and feel that I must say again) is that they operate with impunity and they are "under the radar" when it comes to making policy. No one knows what they are doing until it is done. They are accountable to nobody, except the administration. So in effect we have NON-ELECTED officials, who are backed by The White House, who are given the tools and resources to do the bidding of the President and they are accountable to NO ONE! These czars don't have to undergo Senate Confirmation Hearings, they just get appointed by Obama. What is happening here? It seems to me that Obama is creating an alternative to the constitutionally sanctioned government administrators. This, in and of itself, creates an alternative, in other words another government which is responsible to reporting ONLY to Obama. That, folks, is what happens before someone illegally takes over a country. Read your history books. Laugh if you want and call me a nut if you want. They began to deliver the goods and promises to the masses while the legitimate government is floundering..... and then, BINGO OVER NIGHT, the alternative government supplants legitimate authority. With some key changes, making them more accountable to We The People, we can bring back what Congress is suppose to be. I learned something interesting recently. The word CZAR is actually the Russian word for Caesar. It also means emperor.

The House of Representatives has now just passed the Waxman-Markey cap-and-trade carbon emissions control act. If it passes the Senate, the bill’s pusher-in-chief (OBAMA) will sign it real fast. I have not read the bill, so I should not put my two cents in. But then, neither has any congressman read the now 1000-pages and more of this great amazing thing. So why have they passed it. For this reason alone I want to put my two cents worth in. The house has just passed a bill not knowing all of it and most likely not even half of it. We are not to imagine things, but we are to believe it is a good bill because we must trust the congressional assistants who wrote it. If anything it is a demonstration to “the power of believing anything” and the “Yes we can” dogma of Obama It is the eagerness to pass a bill that has not been read, much less understood. The congress reminds me of the rats following the pied piper, Obama is the piper and the congress is the rats. Most people will believe anything and then later they will have to pay the price. The price will be more taxes and a tight-ing of government controls. Doesn’t the government have enough control over our lives? There is one thing that is certain: The cap-and-trade program will increase the cost of energy in the United States. We are already paying through the nose for everything that we as a consumer buy. It is for the most part a huge tax increase on businesses and consumers, in the face of which, businesses will slow down to a crawl and consumers (that’s you and me) will decrease our activity and buying. Things will for sure get tighter. You think we are having hard times now just wait. You are getting ready to see the economy really go bad, much worse than it is now. It is a back door Trojan ( The governments sneaky way of doing things) were the peoples taxes are increased dramatically and they do not even know it or see it coming and we still will follow the pied piper who is OBAMA. Obama and congressional leaders say the bill will create new “green” jobs. But increasing and raising the cost of doing business does not stimulate employment in general. It is just the reverse, it hampers it. This new bill will likely increase demands to build plants and factories outside the United States and even the particular jobs created by such mandates will come at the cost of other jobs. So what are we gaining except higher taxes and more regulations. If you stop and think about it, this great bill so far, rests on a contrast between today's darkening days and the darker days of the Great Depression, when the Congress of that day and the president rushed through the Smoot-Hawley Tariff, thereby digging the depression deeper, marching America into a scary, institution-threatening poverty that only ended in the aftermath of World War II. Back in 1930, general political wisdom had it that protectionism protected the whole economy. There was little evidence for this. It was the outbreak of world war two that really saved the economy. The bill that was passed back in the 1930’s might have helped some people but not the general Population. But protectionism did make believable sense on the surface, like the cap and trade bill does today. And remember back in those days, economists had not yet been bought off, like they are now, by the temptation of power and the appeal of political status, so almost to a man, they opposed the bill. The trouble today most economist are in the tank for they too are following the pied piper. Obama and his new lookouts love to talk of “science” as if the pronouncements of scientists are like prophecies and are totally protected from political pressure and economic incentives. The fact that those scientists and their projects are generally paid for with our tax dollars and tax-supported research grants doesn’t faze today's political leaders. And yet how many of the president's men, or the current Congress, would buy the science supported by tobacco companies? How many would dilly-dally to dismiss the science paid for by oil companies? The double standard regarding the wrong function of science still leans to support those who like to do “great things and mighty” things in government, ( you know like Obama and the yes we can speeches) leaning the other way from those who move forward carefully concerning intrusive regulations, rules, taxes, and prohibiting things they have been not proved as wrong or dangerous. We have seen this in the 20th century. Think of all those economists and experts in the field of economics who pretended they could direct the economy and point it in the right direction. Now we may be witnessing it in the scientist who have wanted, put forth, and pushed this bill that many call the Waxman-Markey outrage. It is a outrage that is for sure. The parallels here are striking. They are similar and share many characteristics. Today's so called leaders in economics and finance, until about nine months ago, confidently thought they could predict the future and manage the economy and eject risk with an detailed statistical collection. Not look what that got us, the government or should I say Obama controls the banks, auto industries, soon health care and many other things. At the rate things are going Obama and his congress will control everything. This is the same thing with today's climate scientists who aim to copy the long-term trends of the worldwide environment. They pretend they can predict where the “tipping points” are, and tell us why, with an air of stimulating certainty. How wrong they are and most Americans will agree with me. This global warming thing was endorsed and promoted by the same man that said he invented the internet. ( Al Gore ) Now that should tell you something. I can say this: the global warming debate most likely made him a few million. I think that “global warming” may soon become an worldwide embarrassment. And then we will witness a whole lot of so called experts sneaking off to write their next research grant proposal in a well-deserved shame and disgrace leaving us, the tax payor, with higher taxes and funding their next project. The cap and trade bill when it fully kicks in will ensure the American people a long, ugly life to our deepening depression. ( oh I’m sorry our recession )

EVER since Franklin Roosevelt put the building blocks of the New Deal in place in his first 100 days in office, presidents have been subjected to the 100-days test. For that brief spell, they have a unique opportunity to put their imprint on history—a honeymoon period when the public gives them the benefit of the doubt and Congress defers to their popular mandate, and they squander it at their peril. Let us look at Obama's accomplishments during his first 100 days and see if that is what you as a American would want. Meet Your new Leader! The first 100 days of Obama that the Mainstream Media does not focus on: Undermining Our Values 1. Calling for the repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act on the White House website. 2. Calling on the White House website for the expansion of federal hate crimes to include homosexual behavior. 3. Calling on the White House website for policies like the “Fairness Doctrine” that could silence conservative and Christian talk radio. 4. Repealing limitations on taxpayer-funding of human embryonic stem cell research. 5. Repealing limitations on taxpayer-funding of abortions overseas. 6. Pledging $50 million to the United Nation’s Population Fund, which supports China ’s draconian one-child policy. 7. Proposing new rules to gut conscience clause protections for pro-life doctors and other medical personnel who don’t want to be forced to perform abortions or other procedures that violate their values. 8. Proposing increased funding for the nation’s largest abortion provider, Planned Parenthood. 9. Calling on the White House website for “a goal that all middle and high school students do 50 hours of community service a year,” (mandatory volunteerism). 10. Inviting homosexual families to the White House Easter Egg Roll. 11. Allowing his attorney general to call for the reinstatement of Clinton-era restrictions on the Second Amendment. 12. Breaking his promise not to appoint lobbyists to his administration. He hired 17 in his first two weeks. 13. Breaking his promise to sign legislation only after a five-day period of public comments. 14. Asking that the monogram for Jesus Christ be covered up during a televised speech at a Catholic university in which Obama quotes the Sermon on the Mount. Undermining Our National Security 15. Apologizing for America in Europe and Latin America . 16. Bowing before the Muslim king of Saudi Arabia . 17. Pledging to base America ’s foreign policy toward Iran on “mutual respect” in a video to the Iranian people and Iran ’s Holocaust-denying dictator. 18. Returning the bust of Winston Churchill given to George Bush after 9/11 by our British allies. 19. Giving British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, the leader of America ’s most loyal ally, a box of DVDs that don’t work in British DVD players. 20. Ordering Guantanamo Bay closed without any idea of where to send the terrorist suspects held there. 21. Suggesting that some of those terrorists now at GITMO may kill again, but may also be released onto U.S. soil and set up with welfare benefits. 22. Caving to communist Cuba by relaxing travel restrictions and remittances for Cuban Americans before any Cuban political prisoners have been released. 23. Shaking hands with Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez. 24. Sitting silently though a 50-minute anti-American diatribe by Nicaragua ’s communist president, Daniel Ortega. 25. Releasing Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, the suspected of masterminding the 2000 suicide bombing of the U.S.S. Cole. 26. Releasing classified CIA memos outlining our interrogation techniques. 27. Telling our CIA agents not to be discouraged when he acknowledges their “mistakes.” 28. Declaring a new openness to “truth commissions” and prosecuting intelligence officials involved in enhanced interrogations of terrorists. 29. Proposing to send a $900 million foreign aid package to Palestinians in Gaza . 30. Asking Congress to relax the law so that some of that money could go to the terrorist organization Hamas. 31. Calling for the U.S. to eliminate its nuclear weapons. 32. Telling Russian President Demitri Medvedev that America ’s commitment to missile defense is negotiable. 33. Dropping the term “enemy combatants” for GITMO detainees. 34. Dropping the term “terrorism” for “man-made disaster.” 35. Dropping the term “Global War on Terror” for “overseas contingency operations.” 36. Giving his first interview as president to the Arab language network Al-Arabiya. 37. Telling the Muslim world that his “job” was to communicate “that the Americans are not your enemy,” when it’s Muslim extremists who have declared war on us. 38. Proposing that military veterans use private insurance for the cost of a service-related injury before they would be eligible for coverage through the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. Undermining Free Enterprise 39. Signing the trillion-dollar plus so-called “stimulus” bill, which the Congressional Budget Office said would actually hurt long-term economic growth. 40. Saying Caterpillar wouldn’t lay off workers if his trillion-dollar stimulus bill passed Congress. Obama signed the bill on Feb. 17th. On March 17th, Caterpillar laid off nearly 2,500 workers. 41. Hosting a “Fiscal Responsibility Summit” one week after signing the trillion-dollar “stimulus” bill. 42. Railing against “outrageous recklessness and greed” of AIG bonuses that were legally protected in the so-called “stimulus” bill he signed four days after it passed, not five as he promised. 43. Breaking his promise on earmark reform by signing the $410 billion “omnibus” spending bill with billions in earmarks. 44. Proposing a $3.6 trillion budget that doubles the national debt in five years and triples it in ten years. 45. Proposing a “carbon cap and trade” scheme that will raise energy taxes by hundreds of billions, even trillions, of dollars. 46. Burning more than 9,000 gallons of jet fuel to fly to Iowa for Earth Day to promote “wind power.” 47. Proposing $634 billion in higher taxes for socialized health care. 48. Proposing to raise taxes on small business owners. 49. Saying the White House is open to the idea of taxing employer-sponsored health care benefits as income. 50. Signing a massive expansion of the State Children’s Health Insurance Program, calling it “a down payment on my commitment to cover every single American.” 51. Establishing the Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research to give bureaucrats the power to ration health care and tell your doctors what care you can and cannot have. 52. Signing the 2009 Omnibus Public Land Management Act, which the Sierra Club praised specifically because it “will safeguard millions of acres … from oil and gas leasing.” 53. Suggesting he has found $1.5 trillion in bogus “savings” by not spending money in Iraq that we were not planning to spend years from now. 54. Ordering his Cabinet to “cut” $100 million in spending in 90 days, after proposing nearly $5 trillion in spending in his first 90 days. 55. Proposing to limit tax deductions for home mortgage interest. 56. Proposing to limit tax deductions for charitable donations. 57. Refusing to allow banks to repay TARP money. 58. Bailing out AMTRAK with a 10% increase in its taxpayer subsidies. 59. Bailing out the United Auto Workers Union with billions of taxpayer dollars to GM and Chrysler. 60. Bailing out the United Auto Workers by giving it a majority ownership stake in Chrysler. Yes, the union will own the company. 61. Bailing out Big Labor by issuing an executive order mandating that infrastructure projects paid for with “stimulus” funds must use union labor, guaranteeing higher costs for the taxpayer. 62. Bailing out Big Labor again by repealing regulations requiring the disclosure of how union dues are spent. So much for “transparency.” 63. Saying, “The United States government has no interest in running GM,” then vowing that the government will back auto warranties. 64. Saying, “The United States government has no interest in running GM,” then firing the CEO of General Motors. 65. Allowing states to set their own fuel efficiency and emissions standards, making it harder for struggling auto makers to compete. Personnel Is Policy 66. Nominating Timothy “The Turbo Tax Evader” Geithner as Treasury Secretary to oversee the IRS. 67. Nominating as attorney general Eric Holder, who urged Bill Clinton to pardon tax evader Marc Rich and 8 FALN terrorists. 68. Nominating David Ogden, a prominent attorney for the pornography industry, to be Deputy Attorney General. 69. Nominating Tom Daschle, who owed more than $140,000 in back taxes, as Health and Human Services Secretary. 70. Nominating Kathleen Sebelius, who is ardently pro-abortion and owed $8,000 in back taxes, to be HHS Secretary. 71. Nominating Janet Napolitano, who said, “crossing the border is not a crime per se,” as Homeland Security Secretary. 72. Nominating Steven Chu as Energy Secretary. Last September, Chu said, “Somehow, we have to figure out how to boost the price of gasoline to the levels in Europe ,” which at that time were roughly $8.00 a gallon. 73. Nominating Ron Kirk, who owed more than $6,000 in back taxes, as Trade Representative. 74. Nominating Bill Richardson, who was embroiled in an ethics scandal, as Secretary of Commerce. 75. Nominating Nancy Killefer, who also owed back taxes, to be the government’s “Efficiency Czar.” 76. Nominating Rosa Brooks, a leftwing acolyte of George Soros, as an advisor to the Undersecretary of Defense for Policy. 77. Nominating Harold Koh, an ardent supporter of using international law in the interpretation of our Constitution, to be the top legal advisor to the State Department. 78. Nominating Carol Browner, who was a member of the Socialist International, to be “Climate and Energy Czar.” 79. Nominating John Holdren, an environmental extremist and advocate of population control, as the White House Science Advisor. 80. Nominating Dawn Johnsen, who is so pro-abortion she once compared pregnancy to slavery, to to direct the Office of Legal Counsel at the Justice Department. 81. Nominating Charles Freeman, an anti-Israel, pro-Arab apologist, to be head of the National Intelligence Council. 82. Nominating Tony West, who represented American Taliban John Walker Lindh and exposed the Bush Administration’s terrorist surveillance program, to the Justice Department’s Civil Division. 83. Nominating Annette Nazareth to be Deputy Treasury Secretary, who withdrew after a month-long probe into her taxes. 84. Trying to nominate pro-abortion Catholics to be ambassador to the Vatican , a move even John Kerry opposed. 85. Appointing Ellen Moran of the pro-abortion group Emily’s List as his White House communications director. 86. Appointing Melody Barnes, a board member of Emily’s List and Planned Parenthood, as his director of the Domestic Policy Council. 87. Appointing Harry Knox of the Human Rights Campaign (the largest homosexual rights lobbying group) to the White House’s Faith Based Advisory Council. 88. Appointing Adolfo Carrion as Director of White House Office of Urban Affairs, even though he is under investigation for kickbacks in a scandal nearly identical to one that cost GOP Senator Ted Stevens his election. 89. Nominating David Hamilton as his first appointment to a federal appeals court. Judge Hamilton has issued a number of controversial rulings, including prohibiting the Indiana House of Representatives from opening sessions with prayers in the name of Jesus. Other Obama Outrages 90. Telling congressional Republicans to stop listening to Rush Limbaugh. 91. Coordinating attacks on Rush Limbaugh, Rick Santelli and Jim Cramer out of the White House. 92. Hosting weekly parties at the White House, serving up $100-a-pound Waygu beef during what Obama called, “the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression.” 93. Laughing it up on 60 Minutes as the country is mired in a recession. 94. Allowing Air Force One to buzz the Statue of Liberty and lower Manhattan , creating panic in New York City . 95. Disparaging Special Olympians on the Tonight Show. 96. Allowing his Department of Homeland Security to issue a report accusing pro-life, smaller government conservatives and returning Iraq/Afghanistan veterans of being “rightwing extremists.” 97. Promising to push for comprehensive immigration reform, i.e., amnesty. 98. Killing the school voucher program in the District of Columbia , while sending his two daughters to an elite private school, rather than D.C.’s public schools. 99. Moving the Census out of the Department of Commerce and into the White House. 100. Relying too much on his teleprompter.

The Democratic Party's Outlook, For The Future On Elections (In My Opinion) Is Not Admirable Or Highly Regarded. But It Is Very Impressive And Striking. That Is To Say This: They Plan To Win At Any Cost. Do And Say Whatever It Takes To Win. The Recent Chain Of Events Has Shown They Will Do Anything To Get Elected. Just Think About Who They Have Associated Themselves With And Who Is Behind Them. That Should Scare You To Death! Democrats Spend The Taxpayers Money(Think About This And Let It Sink In) On Groups Like ACORN That, Among Other Disgusting And Dirty Tactics, Seek Out Skid Row Bodies And Wheel Them To Polling Places. All The Democratic National Committee Needs Are Vans And The Smelling Salts. Democrats Brazenly And Shamelessly Take Policy Positions And Viewpoints Such As More Government Services And Amnesty For Illegal Immigrants - Not Because That Is The Right Thing To Do, But Because They Are Bribes That They Know Will Work For Them And Guarantee Them The Vote. They Do Not Care That The Policies Will Hurt The Country. They Do Not Care About What It Is Doing To The Economy Or The Security Of This Nation. But It Is To Get That Vote. It Is All About Power. Sometimes I Think (My Opinion Only) That The Democrat Party Would Give Out Free Booze, Needles, Methadone, And Medical Marijuana (In Voter Goodie Bags) If They Could Get Away With It, Just To Get That Vote. Nothing Is Honorable Any More. Democrats A Long Time Ago Got Rid Of America's Melting-Pot Ideal, You Know, E Pluribus Unum ("Out Of Many, One") . This Was What Made Our Country Great. A Person Would Come To This Country And Would Learn The English Language And The Way Of Life. They Would More Or Less Melt Into The American Society. Most Democrats Do Not Want This Because It Stops And Interrupts Their Drive For Unending Rule. Splitting The Country Into Separate Distinctive Groups And Playing Them Against Each Other Works A Lot Better. This Is How They Win. That Is Going To Be The Down Fall Of This Country. And Anyone Who Disagrees With Them Is A Racist. We Have Seen That During This Last Election With Obama And We Are Still Seeing It. If You Do Not Agree With Him You Are A Racist. I'm Want To Make It Perfectly Clear That I'm A Conservative American, Not A Republican, Not A Democrat, I'm Not A Racist, I'm Not A Kool Aid Drinker And I Have Not Feel Off Any Turnip Truck. I Can See What Is Happening To This Country And I (Along With Millions Of Other Americans) Do Not Like The Direction This Country Is Heading In. We Are Living In A Giveaway Society. I Do Not Care What Race Or Color Obama Is Or Is Not. I Can Name At List Three Black Men Who Would Make Great Presidents And Obama Is Not One Of Them. So Do Not Call Me A Racist Or A Sore Loser. One Of The First Things President Obama And The Democrats Tried To Do Was To Take Control Of The Census Bureau. (Remember That?) This Was And Is An Undertaking That Could Change The Congressional Districts And Make Certain Democratic Majorities For Years To Come. The New President And The Democrat Party Also Made Out An Enemies List, Focusing On Conservative Talk-Radio Hosts. He Also Appears To Have Singled Out Fox News. Why Fox News? Why Not ABC, CNN, CBS, NBC, The New York Times, Or Some Of The Other News Agencies? It Is Because Fox News Is For The Most Part Fair And Balanced. That Is Why Their Ratings Are Always So High. These Transparent Political Gestures Were Done In The Middle Of The Economic Mess That We Were In And By The Way That We Are Still In. The Mainstream Media Excitement, Over Obama, To Make Sure Of A Lasting Victory For A New Democratic Party Was Plain To See During The Campaign And Still Is. In Other Words Moveon.Org, George Soros And Acorn Are In Charge Now. This Is Your New Democrat Party. This Is What We Have To Look Forward To. The New Democrat Party Is Not Like The Old Democrat Party Of Mom And Pop. With People Like Obama, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, And Joe Bidden, (I Could Go On And On) Are The Leaders Then You Got To Know It Is Not That Same Old Party. When Elected, The Democrats Gave Out Billions Of Dollars As Bonuses To Their Basic Supporters That We As Taxpayers Paid. Just Think About The Stimulus Package, This Is A Out Of The Ordinary Payback For Big Labor Unions, Liberal Activist Groups And Conglomerate Corporations. It Would Be Hard Pressed For Me Or Anybody Else To Name A Single Democratic Policy That Is Not Motivated More By Dogma And Their Leftist Attitude Than Winning An Election By Any Means. They Stimulated Their Corrupt Base Not The Economy. That's Right, The Small Man, The Tax Payer Is Still No Better Off, In Fact Worse, Since Obama And The Democrats Have Come To Power. The Main Stream Media Is Not Going To Expose This Transparent (One Of Obama's Famous And Favorite Words) Fraud When The Main Stream Media Are In The Tank For Obama And The Democrats. NBC News, (Whose Is Owned By General Electric) Is Getting Billions In Stimulus Cash. So Why Not Propagate And Spread The Democrats Policies. The Liberal News Media Is At The Forefront Of A Off The Wall Campaign To Operate As A Check On The Party That Is Out Of Power (The Republicans) , Not The Party In Power (The Democrats). In Other Words They Will Keep Up Their Love Affair With The Obama Administration ( No Need For The Viagra) There Is No Checks And Balances To Prevent Them Turning This Country From A Capitalist Nation Into A Socialist Nation Where People Depend On The Government For Everything. Needless To Say There Are Millions Of People In This Country That Like That Idea Because That Is How They Were Raised. They Think The Government Owes Them Everything. The Democrats Under President Johnson Started This With THE GREAT SOCIETY And We Have Been In A Downward Spiral, To Some Degree, Ever Since. Obama And The Democrats Say We Need To Spread The Wealth Around, In Other Words As The Old Democrat Saying Of Years Ago: ".A Chicken In Every Pot.: What Happens When There Is No More Wealth To Spread Around. With Democrats Holding Comfortable And Secure Majority In The House And Senate, As Well As Controlling The Executive Branch, It's Only Logical And Commonsense That The Mainstream Media Will Focus Their Analysis And News Reporting On Rush Limbaugh, Former President George W. Bush, Sarah Palin, And Any Other Republican That Can Mount Or Establish A Campaign Against The Democrat Party. Why Would They Do This? To Keep Their Love Affair, With Obama Going. They Did It In The Election And Still Do It With Great Skill And As Long As The Media Has This Ongoing And Continuous Love Affair With Obama Little Will Change. What Upsets Me The Most Is That Republicans Seem To Think, For Some Reason, Democrats Can Be Their Friends. They Had Better Wake Up And Smell The Coffee. If They Do Not Get Motivated Things Will Only Get Worse. Listen, This Country Is On A Downward Spiral That Will Soon Not Be Able To Be Reversed. We Are Headed To Being A Socialist Nation Real Fast Were The Government Has Control Over Every Part Of Your Life. It Is Getting Close To That Now. There Will Soon, If Not Already, Will Be No More Checks And Balances In Our Government, Because Liberal Democrats Own The Store. In The Next Election, Things Need To Be Considerably A Whole Lot Different. The Republican Party Will Not Survive And Continue In Existence, If It Doesn't Recognize The Truth That The Democrats Are Its Adversary And Not Just Its Opponent, There Is A Big Difference There. They Must Realize That They Must Begin To Play For Keeps. That Means Telling It Like It Is And Stop Trying To Play By The Rules Because The Other Boys (The Democrats) Have Not Played By The Rules For Years And They Just About Have The Whole Bag Of Marbles. This Is Not The Democrat Party Of Old. This Party Has Thrown The Rules Out The Door And Just Look At What We Got. An Arrogant, Yes We Can, President That Some People Think Is The Messiah. A President, With The Help Of The Democrat Party And Some Rubber Legged Liberal Republicans Is Turning Our Great Country Into A Socialist Nation. The Near End Of Freedom As We Know It And The Start Of Socialism, Which Is No More Than Communism, Is Creeping Up On Us Fast. These May Be Hard Words But They Are The Truth.

When Obama goes to Egypt this week to give a major address to the Muslim world, what will he say? Will he tip toe through the tulips once again? Will he once again apologize  for what he calls, America’s arrogance. Will he kiss the feet of the Egyptian Leaders like he did the leaders in Saudi Arabia? Will he once again tell the Muslim world that he is sorry for how America has treated them? Will he tell them that he is sorry for any anti-Muslim feelings that most Americans think and feel? Will he tell them that America is not at war with the Muslim world and will he once again tell the Muslim world that he is so sorry for the way most people in America think? This is what he basically done on his last visit to the Muslim world. Obama does not need to patronize the Muslim people, he needs to tell them the truth. He needs to tell the Muslim world that the country he is president of ( The United States) has not declared war on Muslims and Islam.  Obama needs to say that America has no desire to be at war with the Muslim world. He then needs to go way back and  very deep, into the relationship that our country has had with the Muslim world for the past thirty or more years. In the last 20-30 years America did not just respect Muslims, but this country also bled and died for Muslims. We Americans were in, at least, five military conflicts on behalf of Muslims, each one resulting in the liberation of a Muslim people: Bosnia, Kosovo, Kuwait, Afghanistan and Iraq. "Bosnia and Kosovo, as well as the 1992-93 Somalia involvement  in which the United States feed starving African Muslims and for that  43 Americans were killed. That was the thanks that Americans got. In none of them was there any important U.S. strategic interest at stake. So, in fact, in these 20 to 30  years, my country, the United States of America has done more for suffering and oppressed Muslims than any other nation, Muslim or non-Muslim. Do you think he will

 For all this America has not only not received even a little thanks from the Muslim world, it has been the object of hatred, mass murder, and economic attack from Muslim individuals, groups, and countries. That is some of the truths that Obama needs to say. But we all know he will not, we will never hear it from this president. He needs to remind the Muslims that  "In 1973, Muslim terrorists attacked the American embassy in Sudan and murdered our country's ambassador, Cleo Noel, and the chief deputy of the mission, George C. Moore. Later in 1973, the Arab oil embargo against America sent America into a long and painful recession. In 1977, Muslim thugs murdered the U.S. ambassador to Lebanon, Frances E. Meloy, and Robert O.Waring, the U.S. economic counselor. In 1979 radical Muslims violently attacked our country's embassy in Teheran, and for 14 months held American diplomats hostage, often in inexcusable conditions. In 1998, Muslim militants bombed the American embassy in Nairobi, killing 12 Americans and 280 Kenyans, and bombed our embassy in Tanzania, killing another 11 Americans. Then, on Sept. 11, 2001, 19 Muslims who had been living in America slit the throats of American pilots and flight attendants and then flew airplanes into civilian buildings in New York City, burning 3,000 innocent Americans to death. He needs to ask the Muslim world who is at war with who. That is the question that he, as our leader needs to put forth.

Obama needs to ask what would Egypt's reaction would have been had 19 Christians, in the name of Christianity, slaughtered 3,000 Egyptians. How would the Christians of Egypt and elsewhere in the Middle East have fared? That is the kind of questions and speech that he needs to make.Because of persecution by Muslim majorities, Christians have been leaving the Middle East in such great numbers that for the first time since Christ, there are large parts of the Middle East that have become empty of both Jews and Christians. Mr. Obama you need to ask your Muslim friends why. Yet, at the same time, millions of Muslims have moved to Western countries and to America. It is fair to say and the truth of the matter is that the freest, and often the safest, place in the world for a practicing Muslim is the United States of America."Muslim-Americans are treated exactly as other Americans are treated. It is exceedingly rare to hear any anti-Muslim bigotry in my country. And while there is some criticism of the Muslim world, but there is far more criticism of Christians and Jews in America than of Islam.

"Unfortunately, in much of the Muslim world today anti-Jewish speeches and writing are frequently just like the genocidal anti-Semitism and racial hate one heard and read in Nazi Germany during the time of Hitler. This is a stain and scar on your civilization. How can you seriously charge that America is at war with Islam when in fact it is much of the Islamic world that is at war with Jews and Christians? Why are we called the big Satan? What you need to say Mr. President is that America will never abandon Israel.  America  will we never stop supporting that country, because every president since Harry Truman, Democrat and Republican alike, has been fervent about enabling Israel to defend itself from those who wish to destroy it. And that, dear Muslims, is the issue. America will continue to support a two-state solution to the Arab-Israeli dispute, but the real issue with you, the Muslim world,  has never really been about two states. It has always been about Palestinians and other Arabs and Muslims recognizing Israel's right to exist as a Jewish state. That is a clear fact. The bottom line is that the Muslim world wants to rule the entire world with their religion which is one of fear and hate. You hear so many times that Islam is a religion of love. My question is when does the love start and hatred end? Do you think Obama will ask that question?

 The day the Arab world ceases obsessing over the existence of a Jewish state, Israel, which is the size of Belize ( British Honduras) will be a great day for the Arab and Muslim worlds. Your obsession and hatred  with Israel has cost you dearly in every area of social development. This is easily verified. If Israel were destroyed — and the so-called "right of return" of millions of third-generation Palestinian refugees would ensure that outcome as effectively as would a nuclear device from Iran — what difference would that make to the Egyptian economy, to Egyptian lack of freedoms, or anything else that matters to Egyptians? In my opinion, none whatsoever. Preoccupation with Israel has simply enabled the Arab world to not look at their own self and their problems from within for 60 years. The Muslim world needs to look at the inside of their world and stop trying to destroy the United States and Israel. What the Muslim world really needs to do is turn the spot light on their self. This is what our president should say when he goes to Egypt.He needs to tell the Muslim world that  Americans would feel more confident and secure in American-Muslim relations if they had ever seen a large demonstration of Muslims anywhere against all the terror committed by Muslims in the name of Islam , no matter if it is in London, Madrid, New York, Bali, Cairo, or Mumbai.

Obama’s plan to close the U.S. detention center at Guantanamo Bay is creating a dangerous case of putting the freedom of these thugs over our safety. Obama needs to tell the people where these terrorists will go after the detention center at Git Mo is closed. Does he even have a clue yet? We as American people have a right to know exactly what the anointed one plans to do with these terrorists, As Americans we don’t want these terrorists in our n e i g h b o r -hood. Or anywhere close” Obama has promised to have the detention center for the terrorist closed by January. But the White House has yet to tell the American public where the over two hundred detainees will be sent. We as Americans need to keep a close eye on this. He wants the leader of Yemen’s backing for a plan to send them to terrorist treatment centers in Saudi Arabia. The Yemen president wants the Yemen prisoners sent back to Yemen (so they can kill and behead again) The president has no plans for what to do with these killers except turn them loose and when he does, they will kill Americans again and there are some in his administration that has suggested some of these terrorist may come into and live in the United States. Having no solution as to where these killers are going and still closing the prison at Guantanamo is a unsafe risk with our safety here at home and our troops that are over there in harm’s way. I have never heard of letting prisoners go before the war was over. Maybe it fits in with his: “I’m sorry America is so arrogant” policy.

This post was published to A Conservative View Point at 12:22:56 PM 5/5/2009 Barrack Obama in just 100 days of being in the office of the president has moved us from a strong war footing against our enemies to a weak, sissy footing that will sooner or later crumble and fall apart. From a national defense standpoint, Barack Obama is making this country look very weak to the terrorist and to rogue countries like North Korea. The President is dead set on taking away our strong defenses and replacing it with a: “we are sorry policy”. What is motive behind this? At this moment in our nation’s history we do not need this kind of brainless mentality or should I call it teleprompter mentality? We have a man that is leading our country that while he was in the Illinois senate could never vote yes or no, it was most of the time present. Now he is making decisions that can make or break our country. Forget the G.I. Joe, Johnny Get Your Gun image America used to advertize. Obama would rather have us be an apologizing wimp of a country to those who want us dead instead of being a God, guns, and guts country that has made us great. Osama and his thugs are most likely in some Pakistani cave laughing their butts off as they praise Allah and laugh until they cannot stand up at how stupid, dumb, and soft we’ve become in just a few short months while they plot their next “manmade disaster,” (as Janet Napolitano would call it), but I call it an act of terrorism against this country by thugs, who some in our country would call freedom fighters. They are freedom fighters alright. They are fighting hard to take our freedom and very way of life from us. I’m certain that this recent transition from bold to wuss is making all the liberals feel happy as they envision in their heart that they have just climbed up a couple rungs on their liberal evolutionary ladder. Boy are they in for a big surprise. However, no matter how great the Left feels about our transformation from a position of power and strength to being a wuss, millions of merciless and cruel Muslim terrorists and greedy dictators around this world will continue to hate and detest the United States regardless of any amount of appeasement. Some people just will never get that no matter what happens. This is the reason why we need to be strong in the face of our enemies. It is no time to be a wuss. Appeasement is never the best policy. These thugs are already planning out their next terrorist attack against us as our leader apologizes for us being arrogant and tries to appease them. A Lot of Conservative bloggers, radio talk shows, and conservative news commentators are saying that Barack Obama is putting us, as a nation, in a pre-9/11 state of mind. I think calling it a pre-9/11 state of mind is being too polite and to kind. We can forget the way this country was before 9/11. We will never be that safe again with this present administration in control of the country. From a security and safety standpoint, sooner or later Obama’s policies and apologizes are going to make life in the United States, to say the least, real inconvenient, difficult and dangerous for you and me. A lot of the liberal kool aid drinkers and Bush haters were always spouting off about the “Bush Doctrine”. This was a doctrine that has kept this country safe for eight years. Now is the time for all of you non kool aid drinkers to ask what the Obama Doctrine is. The Obama Doctrine is the methodical cutting away and making weak the strengths that have kept us safe. It is the politically correct castration and cutting away of our nation’s defenses and the former practices that has kept us safe as a nation. That is exactly what it is. People will see this when it is too late to stop another catastrophe like 911. No matter what you want to call it when you take away the tools and helps of the people who are protecting us you are weakening our country defenses to keep us safe. There has been a lot of that in the past 100 days of our present administration. According to Obama everything is our fault or Bush’s fault. This country will see as he makes more bows to the Saudi Kings, high fives to Hugo Chavez, sends Ahmadinejad let us talk messages, and talks with Cuba destroying everything the past seven presidents (both democrat and republican) worked for. In addition, if you listen very carefully and read between the lines, you will hear Obama’s administration saying Israel is the grief in the Middle East, while giving billions of dollars to rogue nations, and saying we should get rid of our nukes, all the while blaming everything on Bush. As a independent (neither republican or democrat) I did not agree with everything Bush done but I have to say this: His policy toward keeping our country safe was on target. With the president we have now we cannot no longer say “The War on Terror” because if we do we are not politically correct. Telling the world Islam doesn’t spawn terrorists, and stopping our interrogators from doing their job getting information out of the ones who want us dead and turning prisoners of war lose before the war is over is just not using your brains! What’s next, Mr. President? Giving the keys to the White House to Osama! What I have gleaned from Obama’s teleprompter is this: The Obama Doctrine is, essentially, that America is arrogant; his wife thinks that this country is downright mean, everything is our fault. And to go forward, we must get rid of everything that has kept us strong, secure, and safe because, we do not want to be mean and arrogant anymore. And the liberals who read my post call me a pretty piece of work because I speak out. I might be getting up in age, but I still know and can see what is happening to this country and it is not good! Liberals just do not get it, This world is becoming more and more dangerous every day. When we have an administration such as Obama’s that wants to reduce our nuclear arsenal and do away with it when we have rogue nations building these type of weapons, When it is no longer politically correct to say “war on terror” when thugs are plotting right now the down fall of this country and to kill us, tying the hands of the ones who protect us, bowing to the enemy, and I could go on. My question how is that kind of policy protecting the American Citizen. With this administration if you are against abortion (the murder of millions of unborn babies) you are an extremist. If you voice your opinion against gay marriage you are an extremist, if you are against gun control you are a extremist, if you are a soldier returning from the war you might be a extremist, if you are not for Obama’s agenda then you are a racist, if you go to one of the many tea parties around this country to support your conservative views you are a extremist. To many of the liberals who will read this: In their minds I’m a extremist. According to the English dictionary the meaning of extremist is this: radical, fanatic, activist, revolutionary, rebel, and terrorist. I’m none of these and neither are other conservatives that have no faith in the “YES WE CAN” propaganda that Obama spewed out during his campaign. If Obama continues on his program of dismantling America we might not even have a America as we know it after four years of him and his liberal congress. Now is not a time for conservatives to sit back and say nothing because the liberals will not sit back. We are losing America as we know it. Our freedoms, our way of life is, slowly but surely, being systematically being taking from us.              Conservative View Point

I was born in 1946, which means that during my lifetime 11 men have been president of the United States. There are only a couple that I would want to have as my next-door neighbor. That goes for Republicans as well as Democrat Presidents. But there are only two of them, Carter and Obama, whom I regard as all-out disasters for this country. It took Jimmy Carter four years as president and 29 years out of office to acquire his greatly deserved recognition as useless, a fake and a sanctimonious anti-Semite, but Obama has pulled the same thing off in just a few short months. He has managed this by showing his overall incompetence by surrounding himself with clowns like Joe Bidden ( You know who I mean,”tell another lie, Put your foot in your mouth Joe”); the seriously corrupt politicians, such as Bill Richardson and Tom Daschle; and too many other tax cheats to list in this small space that is available to me. You know the ones I mean, the ones who want you to do as they say, but not as they do. Obama has also proven himself to be a person who does not tell the truth of such great proportions that if he had started out life like Pinocchio, his nose by this time would stretch from the east coast to the west coast, from sea to shining sea. He has fibbed about everything from hardly knowing Bill Ayers at all, to never listening to a Jeremiah Wright lengthy messages on hate America, from saying he will get rid of pork and lobbyists to providing transparency and change we can all believe in. What happen to all those promises of "yes we can?" On top of all that, while spouting the usual political talk which is really nothing about economizing and saving the environment, he had the largest, most expensive inauguration in history (There was none no bigger.) and from the way he and his band of liberal news reporters jet around on the fuel-guzzling Air Force One, you’d think he was a rock star, another Elvis. All of that would be no more or less than business as usual, Washington style, if he weren’t also working overtime at the same time to bankrupt the country and turn America into a socialist state just like Castro’s Cuba. He is turning our country from a Republic, a free nation of laws, to a socialist state where every part of our lives will be controlled by the government. The distressing and unbelievable part of all this is that so many Americans continue to believe him and applaud him. They think he is doing a great job.Those of us who are opposed to the things he is doing are accused of hoping America fails or we are a racist or we are an extremist. Nothing, of course, could be further from the truth. What we, as hard working tax paying citizens, are hoping for is that The United States of America can somehow survive this assault on our freedoms by this administration, and that our economic system and our freedoms can remain basically intact in spite of the combined efforts of Obama, Pelosi, Reid, Frank, Dodd and Geithner (Pinocchio's Helpers), to destroy it. Boy what a scary team. They are doing their best to destroy this nation. Rome burns as the fiddler plays. When I hear people in and out of the media, (who should get down on their knees and thank God or at least their ancestors if they do not believe in God that they were lucky enough to be born in America) spouting off left-wing insults about this country really upset me.. Why would , I will never know, so many of my fellow countrymen be so utterly convinced that Barack Obama is the messiah. The great one. They think (with the liberal medias help) he can do no wrong, but yet he has done nothing right. He has promised change and we are getting that. He has kept that promise. But what is the change? He is taking us down the road to a socialist controlled government that will control every part of your life. There is no part of our society today that is not already heavily influenced by government. Think about that for a minute and see if I’m not right. Now he is putting more government control in place. More control means less freedom. Obama’s great stimulus package, contained millions of dollars that has already been spent on things other than to create jobs. So I would ask: “Where is the change?” It looks like to me it is business as usual in Washington. The stimulus bill was supposed to be about jobs, but it’s gone off the tracks in no time at all. It’s quickly turning into a picture of everything that is wrong with our government. That includes unchecked spending, no accountability for what the government does with our tax dollars, and total disregard for what they should and were elected to do. So where is the change that you continually promised Mr. President when you were campaigning and spewing out “Change and yes we can, transparency in government?” It looks like, to me, it is business as usual. Middle-class families and small businesses across the United States are pulling in their belts and making sacrifices every day during this very hard time for our country. My question is why aren’t you, Mr. President, and your congress doing the same thing instead of having the same old business as usual? In just 100 days of Obama taking office we have a spending package and deficit that is greater than all the other presidents combined. Just think about that. Trillions of dollars that will have to be paid back by future generations if this country last that long. So there was a change and it was not a good one. How are we as Americans benefiting from this “yes we can change” that you are making? You are suppose to be making things better not worse. For what ever the reason, now that the president has fired the CEO and taken over General Motors, do you suppose it will now be called Presidential Motors, and that Cadillac, Buick and Chevrolet, will be re-named Michelle Motors? No pun intended. More government control will never help a country get better. It is like Ronald Regan said: “THE GOVERNMENT IS NOT THE ANSWER TO THE PROBLEM, GOVERNMENT IS THE PROBLEM!” How right he was when he made that statement. Which reminds me, I think that it’s still nothing but a rumor that Obama fired God earlier this week, claiming that the universe isn’t big enough for both of them. You should never listen to rumors even from people who say: Yes we can, or change, or transparency in government because like I say most of the time they are not true even when they come from Saint Obama.

Barack Obama celebrates the hundredth day of his Presidency this week. Liberals say he’s doing a bang up-job. Conservatives on the other hand say it’s been 100 days of complete horror. Obama has catered, and sometimes I think encouraged, the news media that his election to office as president as being close to that of FDR. From a well designed perception and plan Obama always brought up and talked about the Great Depression as a way to galvanize and to get more government intervention and take over in the private sector. But what has Obama and his liberal congress really achieved in its first 100 days that he has been in office to help the American people? Not much except a lot of talk and speeches aided by a TelePrompTer. Lets take a look at his first 100 days in office and see what he really has done for this country and the American people. This comes from the liberal press. Obama passed a stimulus bill that was largely hammered out and completed before he got into office. It got no Republican votes in the House and only three in the Senate. He signed a spending bill that was all last year’s business. It even had earmarks from Obama, his chief of staff and other members of his Cabinet from their time in Congress. He signed a children’s health care bill that was largely unchanged from legislation that was vetoed by Bush. He appointed a treasury secretary who didn’t pay his taxes, he tried to appoint a Health and Human Services secretary who didn’t pay his taxes, and he decided not to appoint a government accountability czar who didn’t pay her taxes. Great job so far! But where is the change? Despite Obama calling for absolute 100 per cent earmark reform when he was running for office, the President signed a spending bill with over 8,000 earmarks in it on the 51st day of his Presidency, according to research by Americans for Tax Reform. So which is it reform or more pork? What other things has the News Media reported on that has happen since our new president took office? Hear are things that they reported on: Obama visited the Jay Leno show. He made out okay on his NCAA college basketball pool. He fired the CEO of General Motors. He appeared on “60 Minutes” a couple of times. He went to a Bulls-Wizards game. He got a dog. His wife planted a garden. He did some traveling. He went to Canada and then to Europe. He gave the British prime minister some DVDs that don’t work in Europe. He gave the queen an iPod and asked the French and the Germans to spend more money which they declined. He asked the Europeans for more help in Afghanistan they also declined. He said he was sorry that America got the world into this mess. He said that we were a arrogant people. I wonder if he encluded his self in that statement. He reversed a regulation that would have made it harder for labor union bosses to abscond and store up their members’ hard-earned pension money. They don’t want to have too much disclosure and exposure . He also shook hands with Hugo Chavez. The man that hates America and what we stand for. He lifted the travel ban to Cuba that six other democrat and republican presidents kept in place. He has promised to visit Russia and China. I wonder what he will give away or apologize for while he is there. And he also assisted and helped let everyone in the world know exactly what kind of interrogation techniques we use, just in case anybody wants to get ready if they ever get caught trying to terrorize the United States. The president hasn’t done much on the legislative front that wasn’t already cooked up in the last Congress. He hasn’t come up with a cap-and-trade proposal. We haven’t seen his conception of his health care proposal. His budget still isn’t done. We haven’t seen legislation that would regulate the financial services sector. We do know that his proposal to increase taxes on charities and mortgage deductions is dead in the water. We know that the Senate will not do cap and trade under reconciliation and may not do it at all. And while health care reform might happen under a reconciled plan, it is not a done deal. If it is a done deal will it be the best way to go for America? The Obama administration has done a magnificent job of talking a good game when it comes to change and the "yes we can" thing. He has completely reworked and overhauled the art of political communication and has greatly kept the liberal news media bamboozled and falling all over him. That is not hard to do. So we have had a president that has talked a lot since he has been in office but has done nothing so far to benefit the American People. The poor decision making in reversing the Cuban embargo, cutting money from missile defense and the overall defense budget, and closing Guantanamo bay are not very good decisions and could do a lot of harm. A President's job is to keep the nation safe, free, and prosperous during his term in office. The things that he has done so far certainly does not show any of that. We are less safer now than we were 100 days ago. I do not smoke but I find this very interesting, Obama signed into law on February 4th just after the sixteenth day of his presidency, the 156 percent tax increase on tobacco products, which comes out to 61 cents a pack. This is a cigarette tax increase that falls mostly on the shoulders of middle and low-income Americans, This does not go along with Obama’s statement that no Americans who make less than $250,000 will see a tax increase. Experts also say that not increasing taxes will be difficult after increasing federal spending by 8% over last year. The more I read about his promises and what he really does gets me confused to say the least. I think he needs his TelePrompTer reprogramed. No pun intended. In the very end time will tell. This time next year, everyone will know if our new leader has moved the country forward as a whole, or just profited a select few. If he has moved us closer to a socialist form of government or closer to the ideas that this country was founded on. I'm certain that many of the politicians and voters will be singing another tune this time next year. People in the end will vote their wallets. If the economy is still in bad shape our new leader will be far less popular. If the economy isn't fixed in 18 months, the people will look at the currently government in a much more different way, then they will ask: What happen to the "yes we can?"

I was sent this article and I wanted to share it. It is a very good article and it is the truth.A very interesting look at a Black woman's point of view about our new president. I did some research on her and this is what I found out. Anne Wortham is Associate Professor of Sociology at Illinois State University and continuing Visiting Scholar at StanfordUniversity 's Hoover Institution. She is a member of the American Sociological Association and the American Philosophical Association. She has been a John M. Olin Foundation Faculty Fellow, and honored as a Distinguished Alumni of the Year by the National Association for Equal Opportunity in Higher Education. In fall 1988 she was one of a select group of intellectuals who were featured in Bill Moyer's television series, "A World of Ideas." The transcript of her conversation with Moyers has been published in his book, A World of Ideas. Dr. Wortham is author of The Other Side of Racism: A Philosophical Study of Black Race Consciousness which analyzes how race consciousness is transformed into political strategies and policy issues. She has published numerous articles on the implications of individual rights for civil rights policy, and is currently writing a book on theories of social and cultural marginality. Recently, she has published articles on the significance of multiculturalism and Afrocentrism in education, the politics of victimization and the social and political impact of political correctness. Shortly after an interview in 2004 she was awarded tenure. This article by her is truthful and straight down the middle. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- No He Can't by Anne Wortham Fellow Americans, Please know: I am black; I grew up in the segregated South. I did not vote for Barack Obama; I wrote in Ron Paul's name as my choice for president. Most importantly, I am not race conscious. I do not require a black president to know that I am a person of worth, and that life is worth living. I do not require a black president to love the ideal of America .. I cannot join you in your celebration. I feel no elation. There is no smile on my face. I am not jumping with joy. There are no tears of triumph in my eyes. For such emotions and behavior to come from me, I would have to deny all that I know about the requirements of human flourishing and survival - all that I know about the history of the United States of America , all that I know about American race relations, and all that I know about Barack Obama as a politician. I would have to deny the nature of the "change" that Obama asserts has come to America .. Most importantly, I would have to abnegate my certain understanding that you have chosen to sprint down the road to serfdom that we have been on for over a century. I would have to pretend that individual liberty has no value for the success of a human life. I would have to evade your rejection of the slender reed of capitalism on which your success and mine depend. I would have to think it somehow rational that 94 percent of the 12 million blacks in this country voted for a man because he looks like them (that blacks are permitted to play the race card), and that they were joined by self-declared "progressive" whites who voted for him because he doesn't look like them. I would have to wipe my mind clean of all that I know about the kind of people who have advised and taught Barack Obama and will fill posts in his administration - political intellectuals like my former colleagues at the Harvard University 's Kennedy School of Government. I would have to believe that "fairness" is the equivalent of justice. I would have to believe that man who asks me to "go forward in a new spirit of service, in a new service of sacrifice" is speaking in my interest. I would have to accept the premise of a man that economic prosperity comes from the "bottom up," and who arrogantly believesthat he can will it into existence by the use of government force. I would have to admire a man who thinks the standard of living of the masses can be improved by destroying the most productive and the generators of wealth. Finally, Americans, I would have to erase from my consciousness the scene of 125,000 screaming, crying, cheering people in Grant Park, Chicago irrationally chanting "Yes We Can!" Finally, I would have to wipe all memory of all the times I have heard politicians, pundits, journalists, editorialist, bloggers and intellectuals declare that capitalism is dead - and no one, including especially Alan Greenspan, objected to their assumption that the particular version of the anti-capitalistic mentality that they want to replace with their own version of anti-capitalism is anything remotely equivalent to capitalism. So you have made history, Americans. You and your children have elected a black man to the office of the president of the United States , the wounded giant of the world. The battle between John Wayne and Jane Fonda is over - and that Fonda won. Eugene McCarthy and George McGovern must be very happy men. Jimmie Carter, too. And the Kennedy's have at last gotten their Kennedy look-a-like. The self-righteous welfare statistics in the suburbs can feel warm moments of satisfaction for having elected a black person. So, toast yourselves: 60s counter cultural radicals, 80s yuppies and 90s bourgeois bohemians. Toast yourselves, Black America. Shout your glee Harvard, Princeton , Yale, Duke, Stanford, and Berkeley. You have elected not an individual who is qualified to be president, but a black man who, like the pragmatist Franklin Roosevelt, promises to - Do Something! You now have someone who has picked up the baton of Lyndon Johnson's Great Society. But you have also foolishly traded your freedom and mine - what little there is left - for the chance to feel good. There is nothing in me that can share your happy obliviousness. No He Can't

Obama promised if he was elected president there would be changes and he has kept his promises although the changes are not what most Americans, including some that voted for him, wanted. Since he has been elected to the highest office in this land we live in a more dangerous country. We are now living in a country were the president and his liberal congress along with his liberal crony's are taking away our freedoms a little at a time, like here a little and there a little. He is a smooth talker and he has done his homework. We must put a stop to this at the end of these four years or we will have no Republic left and we will not no longer be a free people. Obama is a smooth operator as most people with any intelligent can see. Lets look back at his outlook on several different things during his campaign and after his first 100 days in office to see were he is coming from and where he would like to take this nation. Buy the way he has a good start now and if you have not started to drink the Obama kool aid you will see as I do that he wants 100 percent government control over everything in this country. At the rate we are going we will be calling him king Obama before his four years are up! During his campaign Obama said that he wanted to spread the wealth around. What he was trying to make people think was this: he was going to take it from the rich and give it to the poor. Another Robin Hood. That is a slick way of saying that he wants to take money from hard working people and give it to people that will not work. They would rather rely on the welfare system to keep them. That is not right to begin with and the country can only stand that for a while before everybody is receiving hand outs. So my question is this: What happens after you can spread no wealth around. What happens after every man, women, and child depends on Obama spreading the wealth around and there is no more wealth to spread around. By that time we will have become just like all the of the failing communist Countries. We will be failing too. This is called government control.He has now started to bail out all the big corporations and banks with our tax dollars. He is doing it under the disguise of keeping them from going under. Really! The fact is when you put it all together it is not the helping of these corporations and banks he wants but rather control. GOVERNMENT CONTROL! Some of the banks are seeing that very thing now and are giving the money back. He is making the decisions for these companies and banks. That my friend is what communist nations do! Just stop and think. Is it help or government control?Obama as well as his attorney general are wanting more gun control. He said that he is not after compete gun control but look at his record and what his attorney general is doing. They are putting plans in place to get rid of all guns in this country. They are already saying that 90% of all guns used in the drug wars in Mexico come from the United States. Fox news has already proved them wrong.There are only 17% of the guns coming from the United States that are used by the drug dealers in Mexico. If they can track all these guns that they say is going across the border why is it a problem to track illegal Mexicans coming to this country and send them back with a bag lunch? Once again it is government control over the people plain and simple. They are laying out the ground work to have total gun control. The experts from the past will tell you “gun control works” The problem is check out the experts! It is sad that we live in a country that wants to take the guns away from law abiding citizens that have never been arrested in their life. But it is coming to that. In this day and time that we are living in why take guns away from the citizens, especially since all the problems that we can for see with the terrorist. The answer once again is GOVERNMENT CONTROL!The days of the family doctor and that special care that you got are over, gone to be no more. There is hardly any, if any, family doctor visits to your house like it was in years past. There is no more doctors coming to your house with that little black bag, but this country still has the best doctors, the best hospitals, and the best treatments in the world. That is a fact. If you do not have insurance there are many places that a person can go for help and assistances. The is already a program in place for that. If you do not go it is your own fault. We do not need socialized medicine like so many other countries when we already have the best medical system on the face of the earth. People have already proved that socialized medicine does not work by coming to this country for treatment and by the stories told by the people of those countries who have socialized medicine. To give you an example Canada has socialized medicine but yet thousands from that country come to this country every year for medical treatment. Why would our government want socialized medicine when they already know that it does not work? GOVERNMENT CONTROL!Obama has in his cabinet a person who put out a memo to law enforcement agencies and the national guard that some returning soldiers might be considered terrorist. Some people might be considered terrorist and put on a watch list if they speak out against abortion, gun con control, high taxes, or like some at the resent tea parties. It is a shame because these people would not know what a real terrorist was if one stood in front of them! If you speak out you will soon be on some kind of watch list. Once again it is GOVERNMENT CONTROL.During his campaign for president he made the statement that this country needs a well armed home land security force as big as the armed forces to deal with the security of this nation and that force should only answer to him. When he made that statement then everybody should have raised their heads and turned on their radar. History proves what that is for. We know that Hitler and Stalin both did that and they did it for one purpose. GOVERNMENT CONTROL over the people. We already have the CIA, FBI, and the National security agencies that were designed to protect this country if they were only given the chance to do so. Untie their hands and let them protect us. People have lived so care free in this country for so long they do not get it. We are close (if Obama has his way) to losing our freedom as we know it.His wife said that The United States was a mean country. Obama told the European Nations that we were an arrogant people. His former so called preacher stands behind the pulpit and damns America calling the chickens to come home and roost. Now no one who goes to a church can not go for twenty years and not hear some of this rhetoric that The Rev Wright was spewing from behind the pulpit. I know what the preacher talks about even when I do not go and Obama was no different. America is the most generous country on the face of the earth. So I must say to the First Lady of the country, that is so mean, wait until your husband gets done with this country and then you will know what mean is. Your husband is bring the chickens home to roost fast. Mr. President in my life time I have never seen a president more arrogant and conceded as you are. I have never seen a president who wants so much control as you do. To finish this article I want my liberal friends and conservative friends to know that I do not hate Obama. Hate is not in my vocabulary. I do, however, think that his policies and his over all game plan will lead this country to destruction and the Republic as we know it will no longer exist. He has installed some of the most radical liberals there are in key positions in this country as well as his cabinet. I also think that he has a hidden agenda that is becoming more plain everyday. For the next four years we will have to deal with the most radical president ever elected to office, his liberal cabinet, and a far left liberal democrat congress. There will be no balances or checks. Think about it!

s Our new community organizer/president has just put into a high ranking CIA office Rosa Brooks who just about way off the scale as a liberal. She was a frequent critic of the Bush administration and her criticism goes beyond mere criticism and into the loony conspiracy theories and hate. This is what our president has put into a high position in the CIA! In October 2007 she wrote: "George Bush and Dick Cheney shouldn't be treated like criminals who deserve punishment. They should be treated like psychotics who need treatment." This is what’s now in a top position of the CIA. She wrote in March 2009: "The Bush administration's big legal lies paved the way for some of the most shameful episodes in our history, including the official authorization of torture." Ms. Brooks also supported the Iraqi who threw his shoes at President Bush: She said "He reminded the powerful and powerless alike that a single symbolic gesture can be more effective than a thousand grenades." Now this is coming from a official who is now in the Obama administration in a key position in the CIA.The appointment of Rosa Brooks to a mid level post in the defense department has largely gone under the radar, however it is one of the most perplexing and radical appointments of the Obama administration. Rosa Brooks who was most recently an L.A. Times columnist, now heads to the Pentagon. What headlines! In her new job with the Pentagon, Rosa Brooks will have top security clearance. She will have have access to more of our secrets than most if not all Congressmen and Senators. Now tell me that is not scary. She obviously hates Jews. that is plain to see by some of her statements. She said "Hamas has fired thousands of rockets at Israel, but the rockets have killed only a handful of Israelis.” What is the difference between a handful of human lives and a large amount of human lives. Lives are still lost and there are still grieving love ones. She said “In Israel, politicians jockeying for power have launched the most lethal military assault on Palestinian territory in decades.” Anybody know that what Israel does is to protect their self from the rockets and suicide bombers that kill innocent Israelis. Has Rosa Brooks ever thought about the lethal suicide assaults on the innocent Israelis citizens? Has she ever thought why Israel has attacked Palestinian or has she just fell off a turnip truck? She hates the United States and what it stands for, that is plain to see by her statements that she has made in the past. "Rosa Brooks believes that President Bush and his Administration should be tried at the Geneva Convention as war criminals." Because we have had eight years of no attacks in this country and because Bush carried the fight to the enemy she calls him a war criminal. I tell you if she lived in any other country and said that she would be in jail! Rosa Brooks belongs to several organizations that believe in the elimination of capitalism in America. Rosa Brooks will work for Undersecretary Of Defense for Policy Michele Flournoy who is one of the most hateful left-wing columnist in the country who hates the Military and Conservatives. Rosa has proved to be a zealot against the military and she, will probably share secrets with the her left-wing media friends if she does not like military policy in the Pentagon. I say this because of all her anti American statements. Why would anybody especially the president put somebody like her in the position that she is in. The nomination of Rosa Brooks, Harold Koh and Timothy Geithner and several other nominees that President Obama has appointed to high-level positions shows that this is a strong move toward a Socialist government for our country. You have to wonder and worry how many extreme leftists Obama is going to appoint to powerful and sensitive positions. Obama's promise of change is coming about. Change from a Constitutional Republic to a dictatorial socialist state. The statements made here are public facts that anyone can go on the world wide web and find. Just type her name in and see as I did if you want to. If you wait for the news papers to tell you, you will never hear a thing. Their love affair with Obama will never end and the only way you will ever hear all the truth is to find it yourself. Rosa Brooks is just one of his appointments that I researched. Are the rest like her?